We
have discussed in our post titled 'Engineering Change Order' about the important to have a uniform
distribution of spare cells in the design. Nowadays, there is a trend among the
VLSI corporations to implement metal-only functional and timing ECOs due to
their low-cost. Let us discuss about the spare cells in a bit more detail here.
Figure showing spare cells in the design |
Spare cells are put onto the chip during implementation keeping into view the possibility of modifications that are planned to be carried out into the design without disturbing the layers of base. This is because carrying out design changes with minimal layer changes saves a lot of cost from fabrication point of view as each layer mask has a significant cost of its own. Let us start by defining what a spare cell is. A spare cell can be thought of as a redundant cell that is not used currently in the design. It may be in use later on, but currently, it is sitting without doing any job. A spare cell does not contribute to the functionality of the device. We can compare a spare cell with a spare wheel being carried in a motor car to be used in case one of the wheels gets punctured. In that case, the spare wheel will be replacing the main wheel. Similarly, a spare cell can be used to replace an existing cell if the situation demands (eg. to meet the timing). However, unlike spare wheels, spare cells may be added to the design even if they do not replace any existing cell according as the need arises.
Kinds of spare cells: There are
many variants of spare cells in the design. Designs are full of spare
inverters, buffers, nand, nor and specially designed configurable spare cells.
However, based on the origin of spare cells, these can be divided into two
broad categories:
- Those used deliberately as spare cells in the design: As discussed earlier, most of the designs today have spare cells sprinkled uniformly. These cells have inputs and outputs tied to either ‘0’ or ‘1’ so that they contribute minimum to static and dynamic power.
- Those converted into spare cells due to design changes: There may be a case that a cell that is being identified as a spare now was a main cell in the past. Due to some design changes, the cell might have been replaced by another cell. Also, some cells have floating outputs. These can be used as spare cells. We can also use the used buffers as spare cells if removing the buffer does not introduce any setup/hold violation in the design.
Advantages of using spare cells in the
design: Introduction of spare cells into the design offers several
advantages such as:
- Reusability: A design change can be carried out using metal layers only. So, the base layers can be re-used for fabrication of new chips.
- Cost reduction: Significant amount of money is saved both in terms of engineering and manufacture costs.
- Design flexibility: As there are spare cells, small changes can be taken into the design without much difficulty. Hence, the presence of spare cells provides flexibility to the design.
- Cycle time reduction: Nowadays, there is a trend to tape out base layers to the foundry for fabrication as masks are not prepared in parallel. In the meantime, the timing violations/design changes are being carried out in metal layers. Hence, there is cycle time reduction of one to two weeks.
Disadvantages of using spare cells:
In addition to many advantages, usage of spare cells offers some disadvantages
too. These are:
- Contribution to static power: Each spare cell has its static power dissipation. Hence, greater amount of spare cells contribute more to power. But, in general, this amount of power is insignificant in comparison to total power. Spare cells should be added keeping into consideration their contribution to power.
- Area: Spare cells occupy area on the chip. So, more spare cells mean more density of cells.
Thus,
we have discussed about the spare cells here. Spare cells are used almost in
every design in each device manufactured today. It is important to make an
intelligent selection of spare cells to be sprinkled in the design. Many
technical papers have been published stating its importance and on the
structure of the spare cells that can be generalized to be used as any of the
logic gate. In general, a collection of nand/nor/inverters/buffers is sprinkled
more or less uniformly. The modules where more number of ECOs are expected,
(like a new architecture being used for the first time) should be sprinkled
with more spare cells. On the contrary, those having stable architectures are
usually sprinkled with less number of spare cells as the probability of an ECO
is very less in the vicinity of these modules/macros.
I hope you’ve found this post useful. Let me know what you think in the comments. I’d love to hear from you all.
Superb explanation
ReplyDeleteCristal clear explanation
ReplyDeleteHi ,I have one question , that is , as far as I know , we ususlly tie the input pins of spare cells , just left the outputs floating , so both inputs and outputs tied can save more power ?
ReplyDeleteHi
DeleteThere can be two cases:
1. Output has invert relationship with input. Examples include nand, nor etc. In that case, what you recommend is possible and more appropriate solution
2. Output has positive unate relationship with the input, examples buffer, and, or, mus etc. In that case, the gate will not be able to settle on a value and will always lie somewhere near vdd/2. And will constantly consume shot circuit power.
Thus, we cannot blindly tie outputs to inputs and need a better algorithm for the same.