All sequential elements require the clock pulse to have a pulse of at-least a certain width in order to function correctly. This is coded in their timing models in terms of a "minimum pulse width" requirement. And the timing path pertaining to check minimum pulse width of a signal is termed as "min-pulse-width-check" timing path. A min-pulse-width-check timing path essentially checks the arrival of one transition of the clock at the endpoint with respect to its fall transition. In other words, both constrained signal and reference signal are the same, just the opposite transitions.
For instance, min-pulse-width-check timing path for a high pulse will have fall transition as the reference signal and rise transition as constrained signal. The latest arrival of rise transition is checked against earliest arrival of fall transition Similarly, min-pulse-width-check timing path for a low pulse will have fall transition as constrained signal and rise transition as reference signal. The latest arrival of fall transition will be checked against earliest arrival of rise transition.
Constraining min-pulse-width-check timing paths: There are two kind of scenarios:
- Min-pulse-width requirement for the pin is picked from timing model
- User specifically specifies a "min-pulse-width" check at a specific pin using "set_min_pulse_width" command. This may be required in certain scenarios, such as a clock going out of the design through an output port, and we need to maintain a minimum duty cycle for the outgoing clock.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your valuable inputs/feedbacks. :-)